By broadening the concept of reality, Auster has created a new kind of mimesis, which blends the representation of the actual with that of the potential. Ever since Aristotle, fiction has aspired to mimesis, to a recognizable representation of reality. But Auster’s latest novel is still unique. If counterfactuals are conveyed through the imaginative creation of alternative realities, all fiction may be considered counterfactual. In the vein of this Borgesian conceit, the time-line of Auster’s novel is also split into forking paths, deploying four different destinies of four protagonists by the same name, one of whom eventually turns out to be the author of the other three. The novel’s structural principle evokes Borges’ iconic story, “The Garden of Forking Paths”, where the Argentinian author toys with the idea of bifurcating time and parallel fictional lives. This premise dictates Auster’s narrative strategy, which involves the juxtaposition of four alternative versions of the protagonist’s character and life. 4 3 2 1 departs from the premise that “the real also consist of what could have happened but didn’t”. 4 3 2 1, Paul Auster’s 2017 novel, is a creative exploration of counterfactual thinking – thinking about what might have been.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |